Jasper infotech v kaff appliances
Web16 ian. 2024 · The fair trade regulator dismissed the complaint by Jasper Infotech Pvt Ltd, which owns and operates e-commerce platform Snapdeal. PTI January 16, 2024, 10:30 IST Web21 ian. 2024 · The present case is pertaining to the information filed by Jasper Infotech (P) Ltd. against Kaff Appliances India (P) Ltd. for the alleged contravention of Section 3(4) …
Jasper infotech v kaff appliances
Did you know?
Web17 feb. 2024 · The CCI has held that online platforms provide an active service to end-consumers and are a part of the distribution chain (Jasper Infotech Private Limited (Snapdeal) v Kaff Appliances India ... Web29 dec. 2014 · EPABX Board Number : 011-24664100 FAX Number : 011-20815022 Combination - Competition Commission of India. 9th Floor, Office Block - 1, Kidwai Nagar (East), New Delhi: 110023, India.
Web哪里可以找行业研究报告？三个皮匠报告网的最新栏目每日会更新大量报告，包括行业研究报告、市场调研报告、行业分析报告、外文报告、会议报告、招股书、白皮书、世界500强企业分析报告以及券商报告等内容的更新，通过最新栏目，大家可以快速找到自己想要的内容。 Web22 iun. 2015 · The Snapdeal Case (Jasper Infotech Pvt Ltd v KAFF Appliances (India) Pvt Ltd) The CCI has directed the Director General to investigate into the allegations pertaining to minimum resale price maintenance imposed by KAFF Appliances (India) Pvt Ltd (KAFF) on an information filed by Jasper Infotech Pvt Ltd (Jasper) under Section 19 of the …
Webmaintenance imposed by KAFF Appliances (India) Pvt Ltd (KAFF) on an information filed by Jasper Infotech Pvt Ltd (Jasper) under Section 19 of the Competition Act, 2002 (Act). Jasper owns and operates www.snapdeal.com (snapdeal) an online market place which provides a medium for buyers and sellers to meet and transact. It was alleged that KAFF ... WebJasper Infotech Private Limited (Snapdeal) v KAFF Appliances (India) Private Limited (Case No 61 of 2014) The Competition Commission of India (CCI) closed a case …
Web15 ian. 2024 · EPABX Board Number : 011-24664100 FAX Number : 011-20815022 Combination - Competition Commission of India. 9th Floor, Office Block - 1, Kidwai Nagar (East), New Delhi: 110023, India.
Web21 apr. 2024 · In stark contrast, in Jasper lnfotech Private Limited (Snapdeal) v. KAFF Appliances, ... Jasper Infotech Private Limited (Snapdeal) and Kaff Appliances Ltd, … bango memeWebJasper Infotech Private Ltd. v. M/S Kaff Appliances (India) Private Ltd.5, the CCI while examining practices of online trading portals held that prescription of price by e-commerce companies to its dealers and insistence to follow a particular pricing regime is in violation of Section 3(4) (e) read with 3(1). Quantitatively, there bang on banners australiaWeb11 apr. 2024 · Jasper Infotech Private Limited (Snapdeal) v KAFF Appliances (India) Private Limited (Case No 61 of 2014) ... (CCI) closed a case involving allegations of … bangomundaWebKAFF Appliances, an Indian multi-national appliances firm based in Gurugram, India. KAFF-FM, a radio station (92.9 FM) licensed to Flagstaff, Arizona, United States. Kecskemét Animation Film Festival, an biennial animation film festival in Kecsemét, Hungary. The IATA airport code for the airfield at the United States Air Force Academy. bangondemandWebThe Competition Commission of India (“CCI/Commission”) vide order dated 15.01.2024 under Section 26 (6) of the Competition Act, 2002 (“the Act”), has dismissed allegations of Resale Price Maintenance (“RPM”) [1] against Kaff Appliances (India) Pvt. Ltd. ( “KAFF/ OP”).The information was filed by Jasper lnfotech Private Limited ... asahi pf 630Web30 iun. 2024 · In the case of Jasper v. Kaff, it was held that the CCI should duly consider the intricacies of these agreements in order to include them within the ambit of the current law concerning vertical restraints. ... Jasper Infotech Pvt. Ltd. v. KAFF Appliances (India) Pvt. Ltd., 2014 SCC OnLine CCI 150. [8] id., at ¶ 33, 34. Share this: WhatsApp ... asahi peripheral wiresWebJasper Infotech Private Ltd. v. M/S Kaff Appliances (India) Private Ltd. 5 , the CCI while examining practices of online trading portals held that prescription of price by e-commerce companies to its dealers and insistence to follow a particular pricing regime is in violation of Section 3(4) (e) read with 3(1). Quantitatively, there bangon janthon