Far 15.305 a 2 i
WebFeb 10, 2010 · Id. (citing FAR § 15.305 (a) (2) (iv)); D&F at 1-2. In support of its position, the protester identifies two other allegedly similar contracts in which (1) a lowest-priced, technically-acceptable selection scheme was employed and (2) the Air Force terminated or modified the contracts due to alleged poor performance. Protest at 8. Web15.303 Responsibilities. ( a) Agency heads are responsible for source selection. The contracting officer is designated as the source selection authority, unless the agency head appoints another individual for a particular acquisition or group of acquisitions. ( b) The source selection authority shall -. ( 1) Establish an evaluation team ...
Far 15.305 a 2 i
Did you know?
Web(2) Past performance evaluation. (i) Past performance information is one indicator of an offeror's ability to perform the contract successfully. The currency and relevance of the … Web(a) The award decision is based on evaluation factors and significant subfactors that are tailored to the acquisition. (b) Evaluation factors and significant subfactors must— (1) Represent the key areas of importance and emphasis to be considered in the source selection decision; and (2) Support meaningful comparison and discrimination between …
WebMar 1, 2024 · FAR 52.204-20 (a) defines “predecessor” as an entity that is replaced by a successor and includes any predecessors of the predecessor.”. The companies that … WebFAR 15.305 (a) (2) (iv). In other words government contractors with admittedly no relevant past performance could still win a contract that is LPTA and could potentially win a protest if the Agency deems its proposal as technically unacceptable for lack of …
WebMay 22, 2014 · Interestingly enough, the FAR defines neither "Past Performance" nor "Past Performance Information". However, in the discussion of past performance evaluation, under the overall topic of proposal evaluation, FAR 15.305(a)(2) lays out the type of information that can be considered. For instance, F... http://www.wifcon.com/discussion/index.php?/topic/1897-far-15305a2iv-and-the-neutral-rating/
WebJun 23, 2016 · FAR 52.232-39 UNENFORCAEBILITY OF UNAUTHORIZED OBLIGATIONS (JUN 2013) FAR 52.233-4 APPLICABLE LAW FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT CLAIM (OCT 2004) FAR 52.212-5, Contract Terms and Conditions Required to Implement Statutes or Executive Orders (JUN 2016) The following subparagraphs of FAR 52.212-5 are …
WebFeb 8, 2010 · The FAR also does not define the term “predecessor companies” in the context of FAR § 15.305(a)(2)(iii). Outside of the context of FAR part 15, FAR § 9.104-6 … the yard diberville msWebApr 19, 2024 · Past performance evaluation reports are required to be entered prepared in CPARS at least annually and at the time the work under a contract or order for the … the yard dogs down at the twist and shoutWebFeb 6, 2014 · See FAR § 15.305(a)(2)(iii); Perini/Jones, Joint Venture, B-285906, Nov. 1, 2000, 2002 CPD ¶ 68 at 4. The relevant consideration is whether the resources of an affiliated company--its workforce, management, facilities or other resources--will be provided or relied upon for contract performance, such that the parent or affiliate will have ... the yard dog addison txWeb8(a) Eligibility: The eligibility of an 8(a) participant for a sole source or competitive 8(a) award cannot be protested per 13 C.F.R. 517(a). Size Protest: Sole source awards made to … the yard dogs bollocksWeb15.305 Proposal evaluation. ( a) Proposal evaluation is an assessment of the proposal and the offeror's ability to perform the prospective contract successfully. An agency shall … safety one eyewear hillsboro moWeb15.305 - 15.305 Proposal evaluation. (a) Proposal evaluation is an assessment of the proposal and the offeror's ability to perform the prospective contract successfully. An agency shall evaluate competitive proposals and then assess their relative qualities solely on the factors and subfactors specified in the solicitation. the yard dog dallasWeb15.305(a)(2)(i) does not apply. If the con-tracting officer determines that a small business’ past performance is not acceptable, the matter shall be referred to the Small Business Administration for a Certificate of Competency deter-mination, in accordance with the pro-cedures contained in subpart 19.6 and 15 U.S.C. 637(b)(7)). safety on internet tips